Trump and Never Trump - Accountability and a Clean Slate

Accountability and a Clean Slate

It finally happened!!! The election is over, Trump won and Clinton lost! You know what that means? We don't have to talk about her any more in comparison to Trump! It's over. The witch is dead! The threat of a Clinton presidency is gone, probably forever. Hopefully forever.

Republicans, let's make peace. In an effort to do this, I present to you....

The Clean Slate

We can all hold him accountable to his promises, and to our values as freedom loving, Constitutional Conservatives. He has a suspicious past, but if he holds to the Constitution now, I will support him every step of the way.
Remember, it is now okay for everyone to hold Trump totally accountable now, Clinton CANNOT take the Presidency.

This is how I propose we do that.

• #NeverTrump voters: Give him a clean slate. If he does well, give him props. There is no going back, so we might as well treat this as a new birth. A new beginning. I won't hold any of his past deeds against him, only the violations to the principles of liberty and morality from this point on. But I will also not compromise my values, nor the principles and integrity of the Constitution.
• Trump voters: Don't make the mistake Democrats make. They are loyal to a fault. We all see it, their candidates can do no wrong. It's how the Clintons and Obama get away with.... everything. No one holds them accountable. So if he does something to violate the Constitution, if he tries to further break the Constitution, if he pursues Big Government/strong-man powers, HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE. That kind of behavior is NOT okay. Trump will not, cannot protect us from Big Government. We are still suffering the effects of the Patriot Act. Only the Constitution can defend us, but only if we restore it. It is not sufficient in it's current form, we need to repeal some bad Amendments.

The absolute worst thing we could do is support his every decision. We have no obligation to support him if he isn't supporting Constitutional principles. That's the oath he will take, right? Let's hold him to it. We can say, "Hey, that law is not okay. I'm not going to support him in that particular action."
Again, this is a mistake we see Democrats make all the time. They are fiercely loyal to their party and politicians to a fault. In fact, it's how the Democrats get away with, well..... murder.

Candidates vs the Constitution

This is a work in progress, specifically written for those who know Hillary Clinton is evil, corrupt, and a threat to the Constitution and our freedoms, but believe Donald Trump will protect and defend the Constitution better than she will.

We are going to do a little exercise to see which candidates are trying to violate the Constitution starting with the Bill of Rights. First we will list the Bill of Rights and underline each right. Notice: The Bill of Rights is not a comprehensive list of all the rights God has given us.

You can find the Bill of Rights here.

Now let’s go through and list which of these rights the candidates have attacked at least once, if not more. By the way, if you have sources you want to add, just let me know in the comments.

By the way, saying, “I love and will defend the Constitution” does not mean they actually love the Constitution, nor does it mean they will defend it. Both candidates say that because it is easy to say. However, it is harder to cover up a mindset of Big Government/anti-Constitution policies.

So you tell me. Are either of these candidates going to preserve a document they care nothing for? How is he going to know what a Constitutionalist looks like when he is getting ready to nominate someone for the Supreme Court if he doesn't know the Constitution himself?

No, Taxation isn't Theft **GASP!**

That's right, taxation isn't theft. At least, not in and of itself. There are forms of taxation that are theft, sure, such as taking money from one man and giving it to another for no compensation, but not all taxation falls into that category.

This is an increasingly common hashtag, although I doubt 90% of the people who share it know what it means.

But let’s go through the argument of LDS libertarians and anarchists. They will use the following quotes from conservatives out of context to support their ideas:

The Creature and the Creator

Former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, and late prophet of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, said:

"The proper function of government, then, is limited to those spheres of activity within which the individual citizen has the right to act. By deriving its just powers from the governed, government becomes primarily a mechanism for defense against bodily harm, theft, and involuntary servitude. It cannot claim the power to redistribute money or property nor to force reluctant citizens to perform acts of charity against their will. Government is created by the people. No individual possesses the power to take another’s wealth or to force others to do good, so no government has the right either.

“The creature cannot exceed the creator."

Powerful words. Can’t argue with that kind of logic! The government ought to have no powers that the people do not have on their own. Otherwise, they could not give those powers to the state. The creature cannot exceed the creator.

Bastiat said the same thing in in The Law. He also stated:

"Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the ceaseless application of his faculties to natural resources. This process is the origin of property.

But it is also true that a man may live and satisfy his wants by seizing and consuming the products of the labor of others. This process is the origin of plunder."

Bastiat goes on to say that when government comes in to take money from one man to give to another (socialism), it is called legal plunder; or in other words, legalized theft. As an economic and political theory, this is communism and socialism.

So if government can only do that which man can do within Natural Law, and government taking from one man to give to another is legal plunder, how can we say taxation isn't theft??

It seems pretty cut and dry, but that is only half of the story.

The Proper Role of Government and Taxes

The proper role of government is to ensure the God given rights of mankind. I have the right to defend myself, my family, and my property, but I cannot do so alone. I do not have the time nor the resources to do so. In fact, no man has the ability to defend his home from invasion from superpowers such as China and Russia, much less local organized crime. I cannot man my own firetruck if mine or my neighbor's house catches on fire.

What, then, is the solution?

The Preamble for the Constitution says part of the proper role of government is to "provide for the common defense." The original Constitution itself gives the Federal Government the ability to collect taxes from the States, and leaves the collection of taxes up to the States (this changed under the 16th and 17th Amendments, which destroyed the checks and balances and protection of the States from the Feds).

On a national level our taxes are used to defend us from foreign invasion. On a State and local level our taxes are used to protect us from organized and unorganized crime. They are also used to protect our communities from wildfires, and even house fires. This is a great example of taxes being used within the proper role of government.

We cannot force police and firemen to do their jobs without compensation. That is slavery. Proper taxation is compensation for the protections of government, protection you would be doing alone if you could. You are giving a portion of your power of self defense against enemy nations and criminals to the government, and paying them for the time they take to do it.

What if someone doesn't want to pay taxes? That's fine, they can either leave immediately and lose those protections, or they can try to vote away those protections. I don't recommend either, especially not the second (because most people have more sense than that), but you are here voluntarily. That's where social contract comes in. If you really think all forms of taxation are theft, and you don't want protection against crime, fire, and invasion, you can leave. There are places you can go and live totally isolated.

Now, this is not to say that our current tax system is remotely moral, by any means. That is part of the struggle, people see how messed up our current tax system is, and they then make a blanket statement against all forms of taxation such as, #taxationistheft.

I yearn for the day that the 16th Amendment is repealed, all forms of faux charity is replaced with true charity through personal donations to churches and non-profits, and the Federal Reserve is totally abolished. That will be a fantastic time for our nation, and the proper role of government and taxation will be restored.

Especially for Mormons

This section uses arguments scriptures from the LDS Church doctrine to further prove that God has no problems with taxation, so long as it is kept within the proper role of government.

Taxation is mentioned a few times in the scriptures, and it seems always in a negative light. But does it say, "taxation is theft," or anything like unto it?

No.

It refers to very specific kinds of taxations, such as the wicked Lamanites who taxed "one fifth of all our possessions" (so 20% taxes are immoral), and then they used that money so they could be lazy and not have to work.

Ether talks about wicked leaders who, "did tax them with heavy taxes," so again with a large amount of taxes being immoral.

Then King Benjamin personally chose to work for himself and not rely on heavy taxes. This is ideal, and something the Founding Fathers also recommended. That is to say nothing of the full time soldiers who defended their borders from the Lamanites, or defended the roads and cities from looters and bandits.

Ideally, all men who serve in public office have already created enough wealth that they do not require money to survive. I would prefer that for our leaders as well, but I do not expect our police and soldiers to be taken as slaves and given no compensation for their work.

Tithing

Lastly, let’s talk about the spiritual form of taxation. Tithing. Both tithing and taxes are used to support a kingdom or government. Even though this is apparent to most people, I regularly have the following argument:

“Well, yes, but tithing is voluntary.”

Sure, and so are taxes.

“No they’re not, if you don’t pay them you go to prison, and in some countries you are killed. God doesn’t use force, He gives us our agency.”

Yeah, and if you use your agency and choose not to pay tithing, guess what happens. You go to spirit prison. And in some cases you spiritually die. 1/3 of the hosts of heaven were FORCibly removed from the Kingdom of God and spiritually died.

Sure, God gives us our agency. But agency isn’t a world without consequences. Agency is a world of responsibility. We can choose to escape that responsibility by moving to the mountains, or a deserted island, but we will not be able to be a light on the hill if we do that. Tithing and taxes are both good and moral things, so long as they are used properly and being collected by moral entities. We don’t have to worry about that in the Church, we need to restore the proper role of government in our nation.

Conclusion

The idea that moral taxation is anything but compensation for protection and the proper governance of our nation is silly, and needs to fall back into obscurity. The idea that legal plunder is immoral is what we need to be fighting for. Otherwise we will not only be wrong, we will be wasting our time.

The Night Stephen Fry Met God

One night, after a long day, Stephen Fry went to sleep. He expected it to be a typical night's rest, one without any particular dreams he remembered. But this wasn't to be.

As soon as he closed his eyes, he woke up again. He wasn't in his bed though, he was in a small wooden booth with screen around the sides, sitting on a comfortable chair.

"Why, I do believe I'm in a confessional box!" He said to himself.

"Of course you are, Stephen." said a voice from the booth next to him. It was a calm voice, and it seemed familiar to him, though he couldn't place where he knew it from.

"And who are you?" he demanded. Stephen Fry was not the sort of man that appreciated being abducted by strangers in the middle of the night. I suppose he was rather typical in that way.

"I heard you had something to say to me. I am Jesus Christ. I am God."

The stranger with the familiar voice said this so matter of factly, with such self assurance, that it took Stephen back for a moment. Then, he laughed.

"Oh, very funny. I know for a fact that there is no God."

"Then how do you explain me?" The voice asked, a hint of amusement in his tone.

"You? I can't even see you! Typical, I should say. Maybe you really are God!"

"Oh Stephen," Christ laughed. "Always the comedian. Even before you were born you could always make me laugh."

"Before I was born I was a bundle of cells. And before that I didn't exist, just like you."
Stephen said with a smirk. 

"Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee..." Christ said, sufferingly.

"What was that?"

"Oh, something I told an old friend of mine."

"You know, 'God,' you still haven't told me who you really are."

"I have, you simply don't believe me. But your belief doesn't change the truth."

"And you still haven't explained why I can't see you."

"Most of the time I would say it is because that would spoil the test if you knew all the answers-" Christ started.

"A test?" Stephen interrupted. "Is that all this life is to you? Just pulling strings to see how we react?"

"No," he responded. "The children of my Father have a very important destiny in the eternities, but first they must prove to themselves and to all of creation that they are worthy of the power and glory that awaits them."

Stephen laughed. Since he is a fine British gentleman he considered it more of a chortle.

"If you looked upon me with your heart in that condition, you would die." Christ said.

"Yes, well, other men claim to have seen you, or, the Being you claim to be. The Bible is full of those stories. Moses said he saw your face."

"Trust me, if you saw what they saw, we would be having this conversation postmortem. Everything I have ever done is for your own good."

"Is that so? You know what, for the sake of argument, I'll humor you for a while. I'll repeat myself from the interview I did on the telly, which I'm sure you are referring to," Stephen began. The stranger in the next cubicle waited patiently.

"How dare you?" He started. "How dare you create a world in which there is such misery that is not our fault? It’s not right. It’s utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain? Bone cancer in children? What’s that about? Because the God who created this universe, if it was created by God, is quite clearly a maniac, utter maniac. Totally selfish. We have to spend our life on our knees thanking you?! What kind of god would do that?

Stephen continued, "This world is splendid, yes, but in it there are insects whose whole lifecycle is to burrow into the eyes of children and make them blind. They eat outwards from the eyes. Why? Why did you do that to us? You could easily have made a creation in which that didn’t exist. It is simply not acceptable. It’s perfectly apparent that you are monstrous. Utterly monstrous and deserves no respect whatsoever. The moment I banish you, life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, more worth living in my opinion."

Stephen was boiling inside at this point, feeling very smug and content with having cornered this man claiming to be God. This line always worked, it always stumped those gullible Christians.

After a few moments of silence, Stephen began to grow uncomfortable.

"Hello?"

"It is very painful, Stephen." Christ said, solemnly.

"What is?"

"River-blindness, caused by Onchocerca volvulus. Bone cancer is extremely painful as well. So is being burned alive, and being drowned. I haven't quite decided which is worse. Probably burning."

"What on earth are you talking about?"

"Can I show you something, Stephen?" Christ asked.

"I suppose so. You've already drug me out of bed, what is it?"

A little door on the side of the confessional box opened, and a hand emerged and covered his eyes. The palm seemed rough, the hand of a working man.

Clearly not the hand of a 'god,' sitting high and mighty on his throne looking down at us. Stephen thought. He did notice a large scar in the center though. Could that be...

Stephen's world shifted, it was enough to make him dizzy.

"What... what happened?" The small cubicle was gone, and he found himself sitting in a garden.

It was a lovely place, he could appreciate that much. A cool breeze touched soft blossoms, sweeping a faint scent in the air. Stars and a full moon lit the sky, and the only sound was Stephens on heartbeat.

"Well, this is quite peaceful. Perhaps I'll get some rest after all." Stephen said out loud. No answer came. Perhaps he was dreaming that he was awake. That would certainly explain how he kept jumping around from place to place.

Just as he was settling against one of the short, mangled looking trees he heard voices approaching. A group of 10 or 12 men approached, stopping at a the gate of a little fence, and then proceeded to enter the garden. That is, most of them sat inside the gate, while one came deeper in, alone.

The man came forward, he was walking right towards Stephen.

"Um, hello." He said, uncomfortable at how close this man was getting. "Can you go to another part of the garden?"

The shadows danced on the man's face, but at one point a gap in the branches lit his entire face.

Stephen gasped. He knew this man! From... somewhere, long ago! Curiosity drove out discomfort, even while the man drew closer.

The man knelt, his arms resting on a stone. He was only a few feet away.

"Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee..."

Stephen knew that voice...

"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."

It was the same as... but it couldn't be!

"Jesus?" Stephen asked. The man ignored him, as though he could neither see nor him him, and continued to pray.

"I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.

"I pray not that thou should take them out of the world, but that thou should keep them from the evil."

The words shocked Stephen back to his concerns. "Yeah, about that, Jesus! If you are so benevolent, how come terrible things happen to good people, innocent children, even your own worshipers! And don't give me that, 'I never said it would be easy I only said it would be worth it" nonsense. You never said that, it's not found in the Bible."

Jesus had stopped praying. Stephen didn't hear all of it, being consumed with his questions and accusations, but he had heard Jesus pray extensively for unity between himself, his followers, and his Father.

Something hand changed. Jesus wasn't holding himself the way he had before, he was straining somehow.... As Stephen watched the details seemed to be magnified better than he should have been able to see in the dim light.

 

Jesus' hands were clenched. His knuckles turned white. He clutched his side, and began to tip over, spilling onto the ground in a heap.

"Jesus?" Stephen asked, his brow furrowed in concern. He move forward to catch the man, but it seemed Stephen was here only as an observer. Jesus fell on his side and began to weep. Clearly in great pain, Christ began praying again, though this time it came out almost as a plea.

"O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." Jesus's voice grew resolute, firm, and altogether meek. "Nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt."

What is happening here? Stephen thought.

Time passed, Jesus the Christ moaned as if in horrific agony, a terrible cry ripping from deep in his throat. Stephen moved to help again, knowing that he was unable to physically affect this poor man, but equally unable to stand idly by during such torture.

This time, however, his hand came away wet.

"Is that..."

"Blood." a new voice finished.

Stephen jumped. He thought he was alone here, and yet from a portal of light in the sky came a man in a pure white robe.

"I'm sorry, but who are you?" Stephen asked.

"I am Michael, though you would know me as Adam."

"Adam? As in Adam and Eve, Adam?"

"The same." He continued to move towards Jesus, who now lay prostrate on the ground, seeming too tired to care about his face mingling with the dust and stone. He was quieter now, it seemed the pain had subsided.

Stephen and Adam watched him for a few moments, and soon he got up and made his way back to the gate and started speaking with the other men. Stephen moved to follow, until Adam said, "Don't bother."

"Why not? Is he going to be okay? It was almost like watching a man die and return over and over again, that was unbearable just to watch!"

"He's not done."

"He... You mean he has to do that again??" Stephen yelled incredulously. Jesus had returned.

A tear escaped the Angel's eye. The look on his face was adoring love, but with a hint of something else. Could it be... guilt? 

"I don't understand."

"You will. At least, you will have the opportunity to understand. I hope, for your own sake, Stephen, that come to you understand."

"What does that mean?" Stephen asked cautiously.

"If you make decisions that prevent yourself from being taught by the Spirit, you will not understand. In that case, the word of the Lord must be fulfilled."

"And which word is that?"

The angel finally broke his gaze from the scene of his God and said,

"For behold, I, God, have suffered these things for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent;

"But if they would not repent they must suffer even as I;

"Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and spirit—and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and shrink -

"Nevertheless, glory be to the Father, and I partook and finished my preparations unto the children of men."

Stephen stood, transfixed for a moment. Then, slowly turned back to watch Jesus Christ.

"Do you mean... if I don't repent, I would have to go through... that?"

"I don't mean anything. It is not my word, it is the Lord's. He is, at this moment, paying the price for you, so that you don't have to. Every pain of guilt from sin, temptation, and affliction of every kind, He is suffering it all for you. If He didn't, you and I would never have deliverance from these things. You could never be cleansed from sin, and never be with God and live in heaven. No one would. All of us would be damned to eternal pain and torment. Therefore, He sets the terms of our redemption. And thankfully, He is a merciful God."

Jesus' voice hoarse from crying, blood and dirt stained his robe and marred his skin. He began clawing at his eyes.

"River-blindness..."

Adam nodded slowly. "The greatest of all has descended below us all. And tomorrow, He will fulfill all hope."

"How will he do that?" Stephen asked. If there was anything the 21st Century needed, it was hope.

"He will die. And then, He will break the band's of death and be raised from the dead. All of our afflictions, though every loss is terrible for us to pass through as mortals, is but a small moment in the eternities."

"The eternities?"

"Yes." Adam answered. "Each eternity is billions of years. Your spirit is as old as creation itself, and will continue through worlds without end."

"But why do we have to pass through such sorrow? Innocent children suffering terrible deaths for no reason!"

"As my wife once said, 'It is better for us to pass through sorrow, that we may know good from evil.' She is a very wise woman, always has been." He smiled, obviously thinking of her.

He then continued, "Imagine if you were born in a world of light, where no variance or shadow was ever detected. What would be the point of seeing if there was nothing to see?"

"Okay...."

"Similarly, what would be the point of feeling if there was nothing to feel?"

"I see...."

Adam could tell the wheels were turning in Stephen's head.

Some time had passed now, and the pain seemed to finally subside. Christ stood, and began to return to the other men. They were sleeping again.

"Finally," Stephen said, "I'm glad that's finally over, this is more than I can bear to watch!"

"He's still not done."

"No! You must be joking!" Stephen exclaimed. "How can he continue?!"

"Because He loves us. The little girl with bone cancer, or the little boy with river blindness. The mother who lost her child, the children who lost their parents. How can they continue?"

"But he just keeps going back! Willingly! What's the point?! Hasn't he suffered enough?"

"No. Not until Mercy has more than satisfied the demands of Justice."

"I don't understand..."

"That's alright, Stephen, this part you don't need to understand at this time."

Jesus had returned. He went back to his position of prayer, but the pain must have hit him like a wave. He fell again, fingernails digging tracks into the dirt, totally overwhelmed by soul ripping agony that would have utterly destroyed lesser men.

It was more than Stephen could watch. In shame, knowing that he had part in God's suffering, he turned away, and hid his face.

More time passed. Finally Stephen asked, "Tell me this then. What does He get out of all this?"

"I'm not sure I understand." Adam said.

"What's his motive? Why subject himself to so much pain?"

"Power."

"Ah ha!" Stephen said, both victoriously, but... also a little disappointed.

"No, not that kind of power." Adam said. "He said it this way: 'For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.'"

"So literally everything he does is to bring about our immortality and eternal life?"

"Correct."

"Then again, why trials?! Why all this unnecessary suffering?! Couldn't the people come to Christ without such terrible suffering?"

"I think this quote has the answer you seek: 'I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them.'"

Stephen was quiet for a long time. "So, it's all to bring us back to Him? Every trial, every pain and affliction we have is to direct us to Him, to bring us to this point, the time in this garden where he suffered to gain the power to overcome sin and death, so that we can live eternally in Heaven?"

Adam smiled. "I have to go now, there is something I've waited thousands of years to help make restitution for."

Adam walked over to the Savior, lying on the ground. Jesus was clearly exhausted now, pain streaked his face. He was visibly shaking on the ground, a man consumed in pain.

How much longer could He go on? Stephen thought.

Adam knelt down beside the Savior of the world, and Christ looked up, eyes squinting through blood, sweat, and tears, directly into the eyes of the angel. Adam gripped his hand, and whispered, "As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive."

Something changed in the Redeemer's countenance. The resolve had returned. Some form of power flowed into Him, inspiring Him in ways Stephen didn't fully understand. He stopped shaking, though the pain clearly continued. He rose again to His knees, and in the midst of the deepest pain He didn't curse God.... He prayed more earnestly. It was as though the Messiah remembered something....

Us. Stephen realized. He remembered us.

And with that, Stephen awoke.

But Stephen, a voice said inside his mind. That same familiar voice.... Will you remember me?

"I...."

Rational Minds vs Tin Foil Crazies

This was a fun article to write, it explores the tactics the secret combinations use on the people of America to keep us distracted, misinformed, and (embarrassingly enough) shy. 

We are going to look at why conspiracy theorists have been painted as being loons. Let's look at real tactics used by the Devil, and consider how they relate to our day.

Ancient Tactics

From the time of his rebellion, Satan has referred to as "the accuser of our brethren." (Rev 12:10) 

Lucifer's angels follow the same tactics. They accuse the righteous of hypocrisy, of being foolish, crazy, or bigoted, of being merciless and uncaring. Sometimes they even get the elect to parrot their lies simply because that is what society has accepted as being normal. 

The fact of the matter is that conspiracies have been a part of human society since the dawn of man, and that hasn't changed as the rest of society has progressed. If anything, they have simply gotten more clever at hiding while they consolidate power. 

And these things do happen in our time. Some of them have been exposed, though the media avoids the word conspiracy and favors the word "scandal." Scandals are fun, wrist slapping misdemeanors; conspiracies are dirty, and only crazy people believe in them, right? 

It is plain to see that the Church of the Devil wants to discredit anyone who is suspicious of the secret works of their works, and the works of their father. 

Rational Minds vs. Tin Foil Crazies

This tactic has been incredibly effective. Even the word "conspiracy" is enough to shut down the minds of a lot of rationally minded people. Perhaps we forget that the very first murder in the history of the world was a conspiracy. It was a secret combination, the very first one, between Cain and Satan.

But even though greed and lust for power are as tempting a sin as ever, conspiracy theorists have been painted as food hoarders wearing tin foil hats, living in bomb shelters in the mountains. 

And to be fair, there are some real wacky ones out there which have burned rational people out to where they won't even consider the ones that may actually be true.

And yet, anyone who reads the scriptures knows that the Devil is hard at work to destroy our liberty. The Devil is hard at work trying to prove that his plan of stealing our agency would have worked. It is, therefore, imperative that he instruct his troops to distract and confuse the good and righteous people of the world. By the way, I will refer to the Church of the Devil, which is any organization, official or unofficial, that knowingly or unknowingly works to steal the liberty and rights of human kind. Politicians, the media, even confused patriots can be enlisted by 

The sad thing is that in the Information Age how easy it is to publish information without evidence or proof. And this happens with conspiracy theorists too, of course, not just the Church of the Devil (in all its official and unofficial forms). 

Because of this, our society has a difficult time being able to recognize good information and bad information. Here is an ironic example:

     

In tactics of espionage, this method of overwhelming a society with worthless or bad intelligence is called disinformation, and its highly effective:

So now we have 4 groups of people. 

1. The large part of them are asleep. They know the pop culture news, but have no idea what is going on around them. They support the Church of the Devil because they have been pacified and lulled away into carnal security. They have been cheated, and are being "led carefully down to hell." (2 Nephi 28:21)
2. The next group are awake, willing to receive information and consider it rationally, though I think many are too afraid to say anything because the large group of sheep get upset when you point out the butcher coming at you with a knife. Heaven forbid you break the lull of carnal security held by the world.
3. The third group are the loud, hysteric doomsdayers, who don't have the discernment (though they swear they do) to know that the Lincoln quote was made up, and will insist that the government has a time machine. 
4. The last group are those who are intentionally trying to dumb us down, and bind us as slaves.

What Can We Do?

The responsibility of rational minds is to ignore the tin foil crazies, and informed other rational minds. Prepare facts, and present yourself well, use discernment. Be prepared to be corrected, because there are some conspiracies out there that just do not add up. 

Have courage, realize that you are making a difference! 

Article from To the Death Media, without the sleazy ads

This article was originally found on To the Death Media. It is being provided here to save the audience from the sleazy advertisements. 

The Facts:  

1) No one saw Scalia die, that we know of, naturally or otherwise.  He was found dead, in his bed, by an unidentified ranch employee, which I am going to go ahead and presume was a room maid, or some such similar employee.  Significantly, an employee without a medical degree, or experience in forensic investigation.

2) No autopsy has been ordered.

3) Within 24 hours, Scalia’s body was moved to a local funeral home, and subjected to embalming.  It is now impossible to do a worthwhile autopsy because the embalming process removes all the blood (which may have carried evidence of poisons or neurotoxins) and the tissue is similarly corrupted by embalming fluid, conveniently erasing any tracks that a poisoner might have left behind.

4) Therefore, there has been no competent medical exam, cursory or otherwise, upon which authorities could base a conclusion of no foul play.  The authorities have jumped to the conclusion that Scalia died naturally, without doing a single thing to confirm or corroborate that conclusion.

5) UPDATE:  mySA, a local San Antonio news site, is reporting this morning on an interview with John Poindexter, the Houston businessman who owns the Cibolo Creek Ranch where Justice Scalia died over the weekend.  Poindexter claims that he was the one who found Scalia, and that he found Scalia with a pillow over his head!

6) Scalia had no serious health issues prior to his death.  So the official narrative is that a 79 year old man in good health suddenly died overnight.  Possible?  Yes.  Plausible?  This leaves Fact and veers into Opinion.

7) The County Judge who pronounced Scalia dead of natural causes is Cinderela Guevara. She made the pronouncement without personally seeing Scalia’s body, and based it solely on a telephone conversation with a local Sheriff’s Officer.  It has not been confirmed whether or not she was informed about Scalia being found with a pillow over his head. She is a Democrat.  She is also a Mexican-American.  No information is yet available on her views regarding the ongoing immigration controversies, or whether she personally benefited from an amnesty program or illegal immigration herself.  Judge Guevara had the authority to order an autopsy but she chose not to do so.  Another County Judge who had been contacted by the Ranch but who could not respond in time has said that she would have ordered an autopsy.   

The Motive:

Justice Scalia was one of four Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court.  The current Supreme Court was balanced on a tight rope, with 4 Justices who ascribe to Originalism in interpreting the Constitution*, 4 Justices who are Obama toadies who automatically uphold whatever he does, and Justice Kennedy, who does whatever gets him the greatest accolades from the Washington D.C. media elites.

*With the exception of Chief Justice Roberts, who appears to have been blackmailed into reversing his original opinion to strike down Obamacare as unconstitutional.  In a bizarre series of events, Roberts ended up writing both the majority opinion and the dissent on the decision to uphold Obamacare, writing a polar opposite opinion days after having written the original opinion striking it down, which then became the dissent.  It was Justice Scalia, in fact, who insisted on keeping Roberts’ name on the dissent of the opinion, to draw attention to his sudden flip flop.

It is well known that Barack Obama wanted to permanently tilt the Supreme Court in favor of his sycophantic toady appointees.  It is also well known that considerable pressure was put on Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire, so that Obama could replace her with a younger drone.  The entire Authoritarian Left had a motive to kill Justice Scalia, from Obama down to the Marxist teaching your kid English at your local middle school, because the Supreme Court is the chief means the Left uses to get its agenda passed on things like Abortion and Marriage for Homosexuals, to the government annexing the health care industry and 1/6th of the economy.  In the coming year, the Supreme Court is set to revisit the divisive issue of abortion, it recently struck down Obama’s EPA making war on the coal industry, and it will end up ruling on Obama’s recent proposal to have Federal “monitors” invade every home in the nation to act as “partners” in raising your child (more on that in tomorrow’s column).

The Means:

The United States Federal Government absolutely has resorted to political assassinations at home, and abroad, in the past.  The U.S. has used assassinations to install dictators all over Central and South America.  The Federal Government uses Hellfire missiles fired from Predator Drones to assassinate its own citizens abroad, on a regular basis.  Federal Agents just assassinated an Oregon protester, Roy Finicum, at a roadblock a week ago. The unarmed Finicum was gunned down and shot nine times.  Anyone who argues this point can go ask Michael Hastings or Ambassador Stevens.  Oh, they’re dead.  Well, let’s ask Vince Foster and the members of Seal Team Six then.  Oh yeah, they’re all dead too.

The Church Committee in Congress in the 1970’s investigated and confirmed that even back then, the CIA had developed a “heart attack gun” that fired tiny poison darts that could induce a heart attack in a victim, or inject a victim with a cancer virus.

Anyone who doubts the Federal government’s willingness to commit murder obviously never heard of the Tuskegee Airmen getting secretly injected with syphilis by their loving government, or all our other current veterans who are put on No Treat Lists by the VA to kill them via Death by Denial.  If the claim is that Justice Scalia died a natural death, then that just means the assassination was a professional hit job.

The timing of Scalia’s passing seems a bit too convenient to me, and the Democrat Party has wasted no time in calling for the Senate to confirm an immediate replacement.  The Democrat Party is filled with radical Marxists and Communists for which pushing their political goals BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY is a moral imperative.  For once, it would be nice not to see the Republicans roll over and play dead.  They might not be playing for too much longer.